office-3

Wilkins v. Piramal Glass USA, Inc.

No. 14-094735 (Mo. Lab. & Indust. Rel. Comm’n. May 19, 2017 )
Full Opinion: [Wilkins v. Piramal Glass USA, Inc.
]

Code(s): C002 Medical Causation; C005 Credibility of Medical Experts; C032 Pre-existing Condition

Factual Background:

Claimant was a mechanic who was responsible for maintaining the machines used by Employer in the manufacture of glass. After squatting on a catwalk to repair a machine, Claimant stood and felt a pop in the back of his left leg below the knee and felt immediate pain. The injury continued to get worse over the next few days and he was diagnosed with a strain. Then, several weeks later, Claimant developed swelling caused by a staph infection and hematoma. He required hospitalization to treat these and it was revealed that several days before the initial injury, Claimant had an open sore on his ankle from new boots. 

ALJ Decision:

The ALJ found that Claimant suffered a compensable accident in regards to the calf strain and hematoma, but denied work-related causation for the staph infection and medical treatment. This was largely due to the existence of the sore and Claimant’s diabetes which increased the likelihood of a staph infection. 

Analysis/Holding:

The Commission disagreed. They found that while Claimant’s diabetes may have been a contributing factor, it was not the prevailing factor. Furthermore, they leaned on Claimant’s expert who stated that the staph infection likely began 24 hours before he was admitted for treatment, meaning the infection was likely not the product of a pre­existing wound to the ankle.

The Commission reversed the ALJ’s decision in part.

The Takeaway:

Pre-existing conditions or injuries may make a claimant more likely to develop or aggravate a work injury, but the fact that a pre-existing condition may be a contributing factor to an injury does not necessarily make it the prevailing factor as to bar compensability.

Having a Seminar?
Join our E-Mail List
to stay up to date with Evans & Dixon