office-2

Johnson v. RPSC D/B/A Price Cutter Plus

No. 15-068034 (Mo. Lab. & Indust. Rel. Comm’n March 3, 2017)

Full Opinion: [Johnson v. RPSC D/B/A Price Cutter Plus]
Code(s): C027 Wage/Compensation Rate Issue; C007 Accident

Factual Background:

Claimant worked full time until 2015, when he retired, but he returned as a part time “floater” that would travel to different stores. Claimant was paid mileage for his travel to and from whatever store he was working at for the day. On his way home from work one day, the deceased was involved in a fatal motor vehicle accident. As a full time employee, Claimant worked 45.14 hours for an average weekly wage of $951.20. As a part time employee he worked 22.4 hours for an AWW of $457.79. 

 

ALJ Decision:

The ALJ used a 30 hour week to calculate based on Section 287.250.3 RSMo, resulting in an average weekly wage of $611.40. Claimant appealed, saying that the AWW should have been what the employee made as a full-time employee. 

Analysis/Holding:

The commission found no evidence to show what the AWW of other full time employees in the same or similar positions was, nor was there evidence to show that Claimant’s duties before and after retirement were of the same and similar nature. However, the commission ultimately affirmed the ALJ’s finding because it was a “fair and just” calculation as laid out in Section 287.250.4 RSMo.

In this case, Employer’s headquarters is in Rogersville, Missouri, where the deceased never traveled to. Because the deceased was not traveling from the headquarters on the day of the accident, Section 287.020.5 does not apply. In this case, the deceased was not traveling from Employer’s principal place of business, and his travel was being subsidized. Because of this, the court found that the deceased died as a result of an injury arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment. 

The Takeaway:

The AWW of a once full-time employee who now works part-time is based on the 30-hour rule. Accidents occurring where an employee is traveling between his/her employer’s principal place of business and home are not compensable and an employer can only have one principal place of business.

Having a Seminar?
Join our E-Mail List
to stay up to date with Evans & Dixon